The paper that brought us scoops such as the Pentagon Papers has given us a
new exclusive. According to the New York Times, there is a growing trend at
weddings to have your pet as a special guest. While most of us wouldn't go as
far as to have a chicken in place of a bouquet, as one delightfully eccentric
interviewee did, it seems surprising in this age of extravagant weddings that
more of our furry friends don't take pride of place in wedding festivities.
The British have long been known the world over as a nation full of
ridiculously soppy pet owners. Early evidence of this comes in the form of a
poignant pet cemetery in Hyde Park, which sprung up in 1881. If the Victorians
went to such great lengths to ensure their dogs would meet them in heaven when
they passed on, why shouldn't you tuck a chicken under your arm as you embark on
what is commonly billed "the happiest day of your life"?
As usual, when it comes to the faintly ridiculous, the UK is taking its cue
from America. Over there, a whole industry has sprung up around ensuring little
Fido looks his best for your big day. Where else would you go for a couture
doggie tuxedo but a website offering "luxury formal wear for pets"?
As I prepare to enter the world of extravagant wedding planning (average
wedding costs have hit £21,000 – do you know how many cats you could get for
that?), I have no idea what to wear, how to entertain guests, or whether to
drunkenly sing Stand By Your Man as people slowly back away. I do know, however,
that my own pet (he's a dog, but a chicken bouquet has got my brain heavily
whirring) will be hugely involved.
One of the couples interviewed by the NYT explained why their dog would be
accompanying them up the aisle: "He's part of the family, so there was never any
question." Call me insane, but this sounds like a perfectly valid argument. A
partner's initial reaction to your pet is surely one of the biggest hurdles to
overcome in a new relationship. A fellow allergic to dogs, or a man who
preferred the company of cats could surely not stick by my side through thick
and thin. No wonder, then, that the couples who sail this challenge victoriously
are so eager to publicise it.
While I'm still not sure of the dog's role in my own proceedings, I'm leaning
heavily towards ringbearer. I've fed him a lifetime of treats, why shouldn't he
do a proper job for a day? I've told him it's that or workfare. Embarrassing the
vicar, and possibly my family with a pet guest still certainly sounds better
than the role animals had in weddings as described in the Bible:
"The blood covenant began with the sacrifice of animals. After splitting
them precisely in half, the animal halves were arranged opposite each other on
the ground, leaving a pathway between them. The two parties making the covenant
would walk from either end of the path, meeting in the middle." Genesis 15:9-1
Since I want happy memories of the day, my beloved and I have decided not to
dismember the family dog in front of the congregation. Instead, he'll be in all
the photos, entertain small children and hopefully bite the ankles of pesky
relatives who refuse to leave when the party winds up. You may be twinning your
life with another, but as the old saying goes:
"Acquiring a dog may be the only time a person gets to choose a
relative."